Issuing a payment order

Law on enforcement and security interest

Payment order shall be issued in special proceeding which is governed by the provisions of Articles from 455 to 466 of Civil Procedure Law.

Conditions for Issuing Payment Orders

When a civil claim is related to a pecuniary claim which is due, this claim shall be proven by a credible document enclosed with the complaint either as an original document or a certified transcript, the court shall issue an order to the respondent to settle the claim (payment order) on condition that it is accompanied by a proof on delivered request for payment due receivables.

The following shall be considered as credible documents:

  • public documents
  • private documents where the signature of the debtor is certified by a competent body
  • promissory notes and cheques with protest and return accounts if these are required for the foundation of the claim
  • extracts from business accounts
  • invoices
  • documents which are deemed as public documents pursuant to specific provisions.

The payment order shall be issued by the court although the plaintiff did not propose the issue of a payment order in the complaint, and all the requirements are satisfied for a payment order to be issued.

If upon a credible document an execution may be requested pursuant to the Law on enforcement and security interest, the court shall issue a payment order only if the plaintiff satisfies the court that a legal interest for such an act exists. If the plaintiff fails to satisfy the court upon existence of legal interest for issuance of a payment order, the court shall reject the complaint.

When the claim is related to a pecuniary claim which is due and does not exceed the amount in Dinars equivalent to 2.000 EUR, calculated by mean exchange rate of the National bank of Serbia on the day of filing the complaint, the court shall issue a payment order to the respondent although no credible documents were submitted with the complaint, but the complaint indicates the grounds and the amount of debt as well as the evidence upon which the truthfulness of the allegations in a complaint can be established.

The payment order shall be issued only against the principal debtor.

The rules of procedure and the court’s decisions on the proposal to issue a payment order

A payment order shall be issued without holding a hearing.

The court shall state in a payment order that the respondent is obliged to perform the claim from the complaint as well to reimburse costs assessed by the court within time limit of eight days from receiving the order, and in litigations pertaining to promissory notes and cheques, within time limit of three days, or to file an objection against the payment order within the same time limits.

The court shall advise the respondent in a payment order that untimely objections shall be rejected.

A payment order shall be served on both parties.

A copy of the complaint enclosed with relevant attachments shall be served on the respondent with the payment order.

If the court does not grant a motion to issue a payment order, it shall resume the proceedings on the complaint pursuant to the provisions of the Law applicable for the general civil proceedings.

No appeal is permitted against a ruling of the court by which it dismisses a motion to issue a payment order.

The respondent may contest the payment order only by an objection. If a payment order is contested only in respect of the decision on costs, such decision may be contested only by an appeal against a ruling.

In the part which has not been contested by an objection the payment order becomes effective.

The court shall reject untimely, incomplete or inadmissible objections without holding a hearing.

If the objections are submitted in due time, the court shall duly schedule a trial hearing without delay.

Parties may present new facts and propose new evidence, whereas the respondent is entitled to put forward new motions in respect of the contested part of a payment order not later than close of the first trial hearing.

In its decision on the merits of the claim, the court shall adjudicate whether a payment order should entirely or partially remain in force or be annulled.

If the respondent objects that there were no legal grounds for issuing the payment order (Articles 455 and 456 of the Civil Procedure Law) or that some impediments to the further course of the proceedings exist, the court shall first rule on this objection. If it establishes that this objection is well founded, the court shall annul the payment order by a ruling, and upon legal effectiveness of that ruling it shall commence with a hearing on the merits when this is appropriate.

If the court does not allow this objection, it shall proceed with the hearing on the merits of the claim, and the court ruling shall be included in the decision on the merits of the case.

If, upon an objection that the debt is not due, the court finds that the claim had become due subsequent to issuance of a payment order and before the trial hearing was concluded, the court shall annul the payment order by a judgement and adjudicate the claim (Article 343, paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Law ).

The court may ex officio declare its lack of territorial jurisdiction, only prior to a payment order being issued.

The respondent is entitled to put forward a motion on the lack of territorial jurisdiction only in an objection against a payment order.

If after a payment order has been issued, the court declares itself lacking subject matter jurisdiction, it shall annul the payment order and refer the case to the court having jurisdiction upon legal effectiveness of a ruling on a lack of jurisdiction.

If subsequent to issuing of a payment order, the court finds that it has no territorial jurisdiction, it shall not annul the payment order, but refer the case to the court having jurisdiction upon legal effectiveness of a ruling on a lack of jurisdiction.

If the court renders a ruling rejecting the complaint in cases provided by the Civil Procedure Law, it shall also annul a payment order.

The plaintiff may withdraw the complaint without the consent of the respondent only before the latter files an objection. If the complaint has been withdrawn, the court shall annul the payment order by a ruling.

If the respondent waives all the objections prior to the conclusion of the trial hearing, the payment order shall remain in force.

In the procedure for issuing payment order before the Commercial courts, the document on the basis of which the payment order is issued shall not be necessarily submitted in the original or certified transcript. The transcript of such document can be certified by an authorised person within a legal entity.

Read more:
Reorganisation plan as a enforceable document »
Debt collection »

Your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk .

Companies Act

Acquisition and disposal of high-value assets

The concept of acquisition and disposal of high-value assets, the procedure for acquisition, i.e. disposal of high-value assets, as well as the consequences of breaching provisions on the disposal of high-value assets, are regulated by the provisions of Articles 470 to 473 of the Companies Act. The cited provisions of the Companies Act apply to…
More info »
Law on Resolving Conflicts of Laws with the Regulations of Other Countries

Conditions for the recognition and enforcement of a foreign court judgment in the Republic of Serbia

A foreign court judgment takes legal effect in the Republic of Serbia after the recognition procedure has been completed by the competent authorities of the Republic of Serbia. The procedure for the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments shall be conducted in accordance with: a bilateral treaty, where the procedural rules are contained in…
More info »
Law on Endowments and Foundations

Establishment of endowments and foundations

The Law on Endowments and Foundations (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, No. 88/2010, 99/2011 – other law and 44/2018 – other law) (hereinafter: the Law on Endowments and Foundations) regulates the establishment and legal status of endowments and foundations, their assets, internal organisation, registration and deletion from the register, activities, status changes, supervision…
More info »
Employment Act

Contract with a director who is a foreign national

In certain specialised industries that are focused on international or specific foreign markets, companies often choose to appoint a foreign national to the position of director. Some of the most common questions that arise when making this decision include: Can I freely decide whether the director will be a domestic or foreign national? What are…
More info »
Law on Healthcare

Mandatory conditions for registering a polyclinic

A polyclinic, as a form of private practice, is established in accordance with the Law on Healthcare (“Official Gazette of RS”, nos. 25/2019, 92/2023 – authentic interpretation, and 29/2025 – Constitutional Court decision – hereinafter: the Law on Healthcare) for at least two different fields of medicine or dental medicine. In addition to the provisions…
More info »
Law on Foreigners

Temporary residence in Serbia based on family reunification

Temporary residence in Serbia based on family reunification allows foreign nationals to legally reside in the Republic of Serbia together with their family members. This type of residence is of particular importance because it protects the right to family life, recognised both by domestic legislation and international standards, and helps prevent families from being separated…
More info »
Patent Law

Recognition of the right of priority in the application for invention protection

The recognition of the right of priority in the application for invention protection is determined in the procedure conducted by the Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Serbia, as the competent authority, in accordance with the provisions of the Patent Law (“Official Gazette of RS”, no. 99/2011, 113/2017 – other law, 95/2018, 66/2019 and…
More info »
Law on Strong Alcoholic Beverages

Legal requirements for the production of strong alcoholic beverages

In the positive law of the Republic of Serbia, the production and trade of strong alcoholic beverages are regulated by: The Law on Strong Alcoholic Beverages (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 92/2015), The Law on Food Safety (“Official Gazette of the RS”, Nos. 41/2009 and 17/2019), The Law on Trade (“Official Gazette of the…
More info »